Memetic algorithms: a short introduction
New ideas in optimization
Combining convergence and diversity in evolutionary multiobjective optimization
Evolutionary Computation
Multiple Objective Optimization with Vector Evaluated Genetic Algorithms
Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Genetic Algorithms
On the Performance Assessment and Comparison of Stochastic Multiobjective Optimizers
PPSN IV Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature
EP '98 Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Evolutionary Programming VII
Comparison of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: Empirical Results
Evolutionary Computation
EMO'03 Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Evolutionary multi-criterion optimization
A multi-objective genetic local search algorithm and itsapplication to flowshop scheduling
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews
A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
A simple but powerful multiobjective hybrid genetic algorithm
Design and application of hybrid intelligent systems
Implementation of Simple Multiobjective Memetic Algorithms and Its Application to Knapsack Problems
International Journal of Hybrid Intelligent Systems
HCS: a new local search strategy for memetic multiobjective evolutionary algorithms
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
New challenges for memetic algorithms on continuous multi-objective problems
Proceedings of the 12th annual conference companion on Genetic and evolutionary computation
Comprehensive Survey of the Hybrid Evolutionary Algorithms
International Journal of Applied Evolutionary Computation
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In this paper, we generalize the replacement rules based on the dominance relation in multiobjective optimization. Ordinary two replacement rules based on the dominance relation are usually employed in a local search (LS) for multiobjective optimization. One is to replace a current solution with a solution which dominates it. The other is to replace the solution with a solution which is not dominated by it. The movable area in the LS with the first rule is very small when the number of objectives is large. On the other hand, it is too huge to move efficiently with the latter. We generalize these extreme rules by counting the number of improved objectives in a candidate solution for LS. We propose a LS with the generalized replacement rule for existing EMO algorithms. Its effectiveness is shown on knapsack problems with two, three, and four objectives.