Genetic programming: on the programming of computers by means of natural selection
Genetic programming: on the programming of computers by means of natural selection
Genetic programming: an introduction: on the automatic evolution of computer programs and its applications
Is The Perfect The Enemy Of The Good?
GECCO '02 Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
An Analysis of Koza's Computational Effort Statistic for Genetic Programming
EuroGP '02 Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Genetic Programming
Parallel evolution using multi-chromosome cartesian genetic programming
Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines
Genetic programming that ensures programs are original
CEC'09 Proceedings of the Eleventh conference on Congress on Evolutionary Computation
Frankenstein's PSO: a composite particle swarm optimization algorithm
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
Confidence intervals for computational effort comparisons
EuroGP'07 Proceedings of the 10th European conference on Genetic programming
EuroGP'11 Proceedings of the 14th European conference on Genetic programming
Genetic programming needs better benchmarks
Proceedings of the 14th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
Achieving COSMOS: a metric for determining when to give up and when to reach for the stars
Proceedings of the 14th annual conference companion on Genetic and evolutionary computation
Better GP benchmarks: community survey results and proposals
Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In this contribution we take a look at the computational effort statistics as described by KOZA. We transfer the notion from generational genetic programming to tournament-selection (steady-state) GP and show why, in both cases, the measured value of the effort often differs from its theoretical counterpart. It is discussed how systematic estimation errors are introduced by a low number of experiments. Two reasons examined are the number of unsuccessful experiments and the variation in the number of fitness evaluations necessary to find a solution among the successful experiments.