Optimal Net Surface Problems with Applications
ICALP '02 Proceedings of the 29th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming
Optimal Surface Segmentation in Volumetric Images-A Graph-Theoretic Approach
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Simultaneous segmentation of multiple closed surfaces using optimal graph searching
IPMI'05 Proceedings of the 19th international conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging
Shape recovery algorithms using level sets in 2-D/3-D medical imagery: a state-of-the-art review
IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine
Speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
Electric Field Theory Motivated Graph Construction for Optimal Medical Image Segmentation
GbRPR '09 Proceedings of the 7th IAPR-TC-15 International Workshop on Graph-Based Representations in Pattern Recognition
MICCAI'07 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention - Volume Part I
Efficient algorithms for segmenting globally optimal and smooth multi-surfaces
IPMI'11 Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Information processing in medical imaging
Faster segmentation algorithm for optical coherence tomography images with guaranteed smoothness
MLMI'11 Proceedings of the Second international conference on Machine learning in medical imaging
Hi-index | 0.00 |
We present a method for the incorporation of regional image information in a 3-D graph-theoretic approach for optimal multiple surface segmentation. By transforming the multiple surface segmentation task into finding a minimum-cost closed set in a vertex-weighted graph, the optimal set of feasible surfaces with respect to an objective function can be found. In the past, this family of graph search applications only used objective functions which incorporated "on-surface" costs. Here, novel "in-region" costs are incorporated. Our new approach is applied to the segmentation of seven intraretinal layer surfaces of 24 3-D macular optical coherence tomography images from 12 subjects. Compared to an expert-defined independent standard, unsigned border positioning errors are comparable to the inter-observer variability (7.8 ± 5.0 µm and 8.1 ± 3.6 µm, respectively).