Software engineering for security: a roadmap
Proceedings of the Conference on The Future of Software Engineering
Identifying Quality-Requirement Conflicts
IEEE Software
An Approach to Knowledge Acquisition Based on the Structure of Personal Construct Systems
IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
ER '02 Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Conceptual Modeling
Security and Privacy Requirements Analysis within a Social Setting
RE '03 Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering
Nonfunctional Requirements: From Elicitation to Conceptual Models
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
Eliciting Non-Functional Requirements Interactions Using the Personal Construct Theory
RE '06 Proceedings of the 14th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference
Communications of the ACM
Semantic-Based Interaction Detection in Aspect-Oriented Scenarios
RE '09 Proceedings of the 2009 17th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, RE
CAiSE'05 Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Information systems designers have been increasingly convinced about the importance of dealing with quality issues at early stages of development. Over the landscape of quality issues, several proposals have been published as to help with respect to security. On the other hand, designers do also need to care about other quality issues; for instance, transparency. Transparency is the quality of having open information to the public. At first, the general intuition is that security and transparency conflict, but how should designers deal with these antagonistic issues? Departing from the use of the Non-Functional Requirements Framework we propose a process, based on Personal Construct Theory, to perform early analysis of antagonistic design issues. Having early analysis of antagonistic quality issues makes it possible for informed decision to be taken early on during IS design. We use the election domain to illustrate the application of our proposal.