The official PGP user's guide
NSPW '97 Proceedings of the 1997 workshop on New security paradigms
Trust evaluation in ad-hoc networks
Proceedings of the 3rd ACM workshop on Wireless security
Semantic constraints for trust transitivity
APCCM '05 Proceedings of the 2nd Asia-Pacific conference on Conceptual modelling - Volume 43
Task delegation using experience-based multi-dimensional trust
Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
Perspectives of online trust and similar constructs: a conceptual clarification
ICEC '06 Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Electronic commerce: The new e-commerce: innovations for conquering current barriers, obstacles and limitations to conducting successful business on the internet
Establishing Trust Beliefs Based on a Uniform Disposition to Trust
SITIS '07 Proceedings of the 2007 Third International IEEE Conference on Signal-Image Technologies and Internet-Based System
The GREEN-NET framework: Energy efficiency in large scale distributed systems
IPDPS '09 Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel&Distributed Processing
Dependability in dynamic, evolving and heterogeneous systems: the connect approach
Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Software Engineering for Resilient Systems
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
While the trust paradigm is essential to broadly extend the communication between the environment's actors, the evaluation of trust becomes a challenge when confronted with initializing the trust relationship and validating the transitive propriety of trust. Whether between users or between organizations, existing solutions work to create for peer to peer networks, flexible and decentralized security mechanisms with trust approach. However, we have noticed that the trust management systems do not make the most of the subjectivity, more specifically, the notion of Disposition to Trust although this aspect of subjectivity has a strong influence on how to assess direct and a transitive trust. For this reason in our study, we tackle this problem by introducing a new distributed trust model called T2D (Trust to Distrust) which is designed to incorporate the following contributions: (i) A behavior model which represents the Disposition to Trust; (ii) Initialization of trust relationship (direct and transitive) according to the defined behavior model.