A wizard-of-Oz system evaluation study

  • Authors:
  • Melita Hajdinjak;France Mihelič

  • Affiliations:
  • University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Laboratory of Artificial Perception, Systems, and Cybernetics, Ljubljana, Slovenia;University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Laboratory of Artificial Perception, Systems, and Cybernetics, Ljubljana, Slovenia

  • Venue:
  • TSD'07 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Text, speech and dialogue
  • Year:
  • 2007

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

In order to evaluate the performance of the dialogue-manager component of a developing, Slovenian and Croatian spoken dialogue system, two Wizard-of-Oz experiments were performed. The only difference between the two experiment settings was in the dialogue-management manner, i.e., while in the first experiment dialogue management was performed by a human, the wizard, in the second experiment it was performed by the newly-implemented dialogue-manager component. The data from both Wizard-of-Oz experiments was evaluated with the PARADISE evaluation framework, a potential general methodology for evaluating and comparing different versions of spoken-language dialogue systems. The study ascertains a remarkable difference in the performance functions when taking different satisfaction-measure sums or even individual scores as the target to be predicted, it proves the indispensableness of the recently introduced database parameters when evaluating information-providing dialogue systems, and it confirms the dialogue manager's cooperativity subject to the incorporated knowledge representation.