LUBM: A benchmark for OWL knowledge base systems
Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web
Towards a complete OWL ontology benchmark
ESWC'06 Proceedings of the 3rd European conference on The Semantic Web: research and applications
Co-occurrence and ranking of entities based on semantic annotation
International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies
Ontology-Driven Imagery Analysis
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Ontologies and Semantic Technologies for Intelligence
SGDB: simple graph database optimized for activation spreading computation
DASFAA'10 Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Database systems for advanced applications
Programming Support Innovations for Emerging Distributed Applications
Ontology-based device descriptions and device repository for building automation devices
EURASIP Journal on Embedded Systems - Special issue on networked embedded systems for energy management and buildings
Comparison of ontology reasoning systems using custom rules
Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics
Clause-iteration with MapReduce to scalably query datagraphs in the SHARD graph-store
Proceedings of the fourth international workshop on Data-intensive distributed computing
SemaKoDE: hybrid system for knowledge discovery in sensor-based smart environments
ICWE'12 Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Web Engineering
RDOTE - Publishing Relational Databases into the Semantic Web
Journal of Systems and Software
Lightweight semantics over web information systems content employing knowledge tags
ER'12 Proceedings of the 2012 international conference on Advances in Conceptual Modeling
SSTDE: an open source semantic spatiotemporal data engine for sensor web
Proceedings of the First ACM SIGSPATIAL Workshop on Sensor Web Enablement
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper presents a comparison of performance of various triple-store technologies currently in either production release or beta test. Our comparison of triple-store technologies is biased toward a deployment scenario where the triple-store needs to load data and respond to queries over a very large knowledge base (on the order of hundreds of millions of triples.) The comparisons in this paper are based on the Lehigh University Benchmark (LUBM) software tools. We used the LUBM university ontology, datasets, and standard queries to perform our comparisons. We find that over our test regimen, the triple-stores based on the DAML DB and BigOWLIM technologies exhibit the best performance among the triple-stores tested.