Lower bounds for identifying subset members with subset queries
Proceedings of the sixth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms
What's hot and what's not: tracking most frequent items dynamically
Proceedings of the twenty-second ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems
Group Testing Problems with Sequences in Experimental Molecular Biology
SEQUENCES '97 Proceedings of the Compression and Complexity of Sequences 1997
Overlaps help: Improved bounds for group testing with interval queries
Discrete Applied Mathematics
International Journal of Bioinformatics Research and Applications
Group testing for image compression
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
Hi-index | 0.00 |
We study the following fault tolerant variant of the interval group testing model: Given four positive integers n, p, s, e, determine the minimum number of questions needed to identify a (possibly empty) set P ⊆ {1, 2,..., n} (|P| ≤ p), under the following constraints. Questions have the form "Is I∩P ≠= Ø", where I can be any interval in {1, 2..., n}. Questions are to be organized in s batches of non-adaptive questions (stages), i.e, questions in a given batch can be formulated relying only on the information gathered with the answers to the questions in the previous batches. Up to e of the answers can be erroneous or lies. The study of interval group testing is motivated by several applications. remarkably, to the problem of identifying splice sites in a genome. In particular, such application motivates to focus algorithms that are fault tolerant to some degree and organize the questions in few stages, i.e., on the cases when s is small, typically not larger than 2. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to consider fault tolerant strategies for interval group testing. We completely characterize the fully non-adaptive situation and provide tight bounds for the case of two batch strategies. Our bounds only differ by a factor of √11/10 for the case p = 1 and at most 2 in the general case.