An experimental study on hyper-heuristics and exam timetabling

  • Authors:
  • Burak Bilgin;Ender Özcan;Emin Erkan Korkmaz

  • Affiliations:
  • Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Yeditepe University, Department of Computer Engineering, Kadiköy/Istanbul, Turkey;Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Yeditepe University, Department of Computer Engineering, Kadiköy/Istanbul, Turkey;Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Yeditepe University, Department of Computer Engineering, Kadiköy/Istanbul, Turkey

  • Venue:
  • PATAT'06 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Practice and theory of automated timetabling VI
  • Year:
  • 2006

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Hyper-heuristics are proposed as a higher level of abstraction as compared to the metaheuristics. Hyper-heuristic methods deploy a set of simple heuristics and use only non-problem-specific data, such as fitness change or heuristic execution time. A typical iteration of a hyper-heuristic algorithm consists of two phases: the heuristic selection method and move acceptance. In this paper, heuristic selection mechanisms and move acceptance criteria in hyper-heuristics are analyzed in depth. Seven heuristic selection methods and five acceptance criteria are implemented. The performance of each selection and acceptance mechanism pair is evaluated on 14 well-known benchmark functions and 21 exam timetabling problem instances.