On site: global perceptions of IS journals
Communications of the ACM
Assessing the value of IS journals
Communications of the ACM - Interaction design and children
Learning to assess the quality of scientific conferences: a case study in computer science
Proceedings of the 9th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Today the proliferation of the availability of the information of scientific events on the Web has created the necessity to offer a quickly access to upto-date information about the quality of these events. This requirement demands for (semi) automatic tools to speedily provide this information. The human-performed activity of the information quality evaluation is extremely time consuming and easily leads to failures. The application OntoQualis here described was motivated to support the quality evaluation of Scientific Conferences, in the Computer Science area, based on the graduated programs evaluation protocol of the Brazilian agency CAPES. The evaluation mechanism is specified in the QUALIS document specifically designed to assess journals and conferences ranking. This paper presents a brief vision of the ongoing process of domain analysis and ontology prototyping aiming to classify Scientific Conferences: the OntoQualis project. Some results of OntoQualis preliminary evaluation have shown a satisfactory classification level in comparison with CAPES-QUALIS ranking.