Going for gold with 2APL

Authors:
L. Astefanoaei;C. P. Mol;M. P. Sindlar;N. A. M. Tinnemeier
Affiliations:
Utrecht University, Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands;Utrecht University, Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands;Utrecht University, Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands;Utrecht University, Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Venue:
ProMAS'07 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Programming multi-agent systems
Year:
2007

Citing 5
Cited 3

MOISE+: towards a structural, functional, and deontic model for MAS organization

Proceedings of the first international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems: part 1
The Gaia Methodology for Agent-Oriented Analysis and Design

Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
Tropos: An Agent-Oriented Software Development Methodology

Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
Developing Intelligent Agent Systems: A Practical Guide

Developing Intelligent Agent Systems: A Practical Guide
Practical extensions in agent programming languages

Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems

2APL: a practical agent programming language

Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
Using agent technology to build a real-world training application

Agents for games and simulations II
The multi-agent programming contest from 2005---2010

Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This paper describes our approach to the Multi-Agent Programming Contest in coordination with ProMAS and AAMAS 2007. The object of the contest is to mine as much gold as possible in competition with other teams in a multi-agent goldrush scenario. Our agents are implemented in 2APL, a BDI-based agent-oriented programming language. As required by the contest, we designed and specified our approach using a multi-agent methodology. Several methodologies were evaluated, and eventually we chose a combination of Moise+ and Tropos.