A Comparison of Traditional and Open-Access Policies for Appointment Scheduling

Authors:
Lawrence W. Robinson;Rachel R. Chen
Affiliations:
Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853;Graduate School of Management, University of California at Davis, Davis, California 95616
Venue:
Manufacturing & Service Operations Management
Year:
2010

Citing 3
Cited 3

Optimally scheduling N customer arrival times for a single-server system

Computers and Operations Research
Scheduling Arrivals to Queues: A Single-Server Model with No-Shows

Management Science
Reducing Delays for Medical Appointments: A Queueing Approach

Operations Research

Dynamic Scheduling of Outpatient Appointments Under Patient No-Shows and Cancellations

Manufacturing & Service Operations Management
Adaptive Appointment Systems with Patient Preferences

Manufacturing & Service Operations Management
A simulation study of appointment scheduling in outpatient clinics: Open access and overbooking

Simulation

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This paper compares two types of appointment-scheduling policies for single providers: traditional and open-access. Under traditional scheduling, each of a specified number of patients per day is booked well in advance, but may not show up for his or her appointment. Under open-access scheduling, a random number of patients call in the morning to make an appointment for that same day. Thus the number of patient arrivals will be random, for different reasons, under both policies. We find that the open-access schedule will significantly outperform the traditional schedule---in terms of a weighted average of patients' waiting time, the doctor's idle time, and the doctor's overtime---except when patient waiting time is held in little regard or when the probability of no-shows is quite small.