ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)
A Logic of Multiple-Valued Argumentation
AAMAS '04 Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 2
Value-based Argumentation Frameworks as Neural-symbolic Learning Systems
Journal of Logic and Computation
An Integrated Argumentation Environment for Arguing Agents
WI '06 Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence
A hybrid argumentation of symbolic and neural net argumentation (Part II)
ArgMAS'07 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Argumentation in multi-agent systems
An integrated argumentation environment for arguing agents
KES-AMSTA'08 Proceedings of the 2nd KES International conference on Agent and multi-agent systems: technologies and applications
A hybrid argumentation of symbolic and neural net argumentation (Part II)
ArgMAS'07 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Argumentation in multi-agent systems
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
A novel approach to argumentation has been started by A. Garcez et al. Inspired by their work, we further go on investigating it, but turn to a more syncretic direction such as the interplay between neural net argumentation and symbolic argumentation. More specifically, we address ourselves to the following basic questions that can not be overlooked. 1. Can the neural argumentation algorithm deal with self-defeating or other pathological arguments? 2. Can the argument status of the neural net argumentation correspond to the well-known argument status? Consequently, we give the positive answers to them. They are beneficial for understanding or characterizing the computation power and outcome of the neural net argumentation from the perspective of the symbolic argumentation. We also exemplify these results.