Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference
Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference
Handbook of logic in artificial intelligence and logic programming (vol. 3)
On the logic of iterated belief revision
Artificial Intelligence
Knowledge-Driven versus Data-Driven Logics
Journal of Logic, Language and Information
A general non-probabilistic theory of inductive reasoning
UAI '88 Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence - Special issue: Fuzzy set and possibility theory-based methods in artificial intelligence
T-conditional possibilities: Coherence and inference
Fuzzy Sets and Systems
Three Scenarios for the Revision of Epistemic States*
Journal of Logic and Computation
Ordinal and probabilistic representations of acceptance
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
Revision sequences and nested conditionals
IJCAI'93 Proceedings of the 13th international joint conference on Artifical intelligence - Volume 1
On the revision of probabilistic beliefs using uncertain evidence
Artificial Intelligence
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on ECAI 2010: 19th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Algorithms for possibility assessments: Coherence and extension
Fuzzy Sets and Systems
ECSQARU'11 Proceedings of the 11th European conference on Symbolic and quantitative approaches to reasoning with uncertainty
Jeffrey's rule of conditioning in a possibilistic framework
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
Syntactic computation of hybrid possibilistic conditioning under uncertain inputs
IJCAI'13 Proceedings of the Twenty-Third international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Intelligent agents require methods to revise their epistemic state as they acquire new information. Jeffrey's rule, which extends conditioning to probabilistic inputs, is appropriate for revising probabilistic epistemic states when new information comes in the form of a partition of events with new probabilities and has priority over prior beliefs. This paper analyses the expressive power of two possibilistic counterparts to Jeffrey's rule for modeling belief revision in intelligent agents. We show that this rule can be used to recover several existing approaches proposed in knowledge base revision, such as adjustment, natural belief revision, drastic belief revision, and the revision of an epistemic state by another epistemic state. In addition, we also show that some recent forms of revision, called improvement operators, can also be recovered in our framework.