Information flow: the logic of distributed systems
Information flow: the logic of distributed systems
Learning to map between ontologies on the semantic web
Proceedings of the 11th international conference on World Wide Web
MAFRA - A MApping FRAmework for Distributed Ontologies
EKAW '02 Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. Ontologies and the Semantic Web
A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching
The VLDB Journal — The International Journal on Very Large Data Bases
AI Magazine
The PROMPT suite: interactive tools for ontology merging and mapping
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
The Knowledge Engineering Review
ACM SIGMOD Record
Schema and ontology matching with COMA++
Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data
Identification of common methods used for ontology integration tasks
Proceedings of the first international workshop on Interoperability of heterogeneous information systems
COMA: a system for flexible combination of schema matching approaches
VLDB '02 Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Very Large Data Bases
FCA-MERGE: bottom-up merging of ontologies
IJCAI'01 Proceedings of the 17th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 1
An ontology matching approach to semantic web services discovery
ISPA'06 Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on Frontiers of High Performance Computing and Networking
A survey of schema-based matching approaches
Journal on Data Semantics IV
Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications and Services
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Ontology matching can be defined as the process of discovering similarities between two ontologies and it can be processed exploiting a number of different techniques. To provide a common conceptual basis, researchers have started to develop classifications to distinguish them. The most significant one is the classification proposed by Shvaiko and Euzenat to compare different existing ontology mediation systems as well as to design a new one. As the classification contains some improper identifications and vague categories, we therefore propose a design and input-specific classification framework of ontology matching techniques to address the above problems based on the findings of the literature survey. The framework provides not only a clear guideline on designing new mediation tool but also an effective method to identify the type of the matching technique and its related executive approach simply by comparing input of mediation system with the input layer in the proposed framework.