Information-theoretic approach to blind separation of sources in non-linear mixture
Signal Processing - Special issue on neural networks
Natural gradient works efficiently in learning
Neural Computation
A new rough sets model based on database systems
Fundamenta Informaticae - Special issue on the 9th international conference on rough sets, fuzzy sets, data mining and granular computing (RSFDGrC 2003)
A maximum likelihood approach to single-channel source separation
The Journal of Machine Learning Research
Fuzzy rough sets hybrid scheme for breast cancer detection
Image and Vision Computing
Computers in Biology and Medicine
Feature Selection Algorithms Using Rough Set Theory
ISDA '07 Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications
Neighborhood rough set based heterogeneous feature subset selection
Information Sciences: an International Journal
Modelling and Simulation in Engineering - Modelling and simulation: computational intelligence in medicine
FSKD '08 Proceedings of the 2008 Fifth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery - Volume 01
Exploring the boundary region of tolerance rough sets for feature selection
Pattern Recognition
A New Classifier Design with Fuzzy Functions
RSFDGrC '07 Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Rough Sets, Fuzzy Sets, Data Mining and Granular Computing
IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems
Hi-index | 0.00 |
We propose a computer aided detection (CAD) system for the detection and classification of suspicious regions inmammographic images. This system combines a dimensionality reduction module (using principal component analysis), a feature extraction module (using independent component analysis), and a feature subset selection module (using rough set model). Rough set model is used to reduce the effect of data inconsistency while a fuzzy classifier is integrated into the system to label subimages into normal or abnormal regions. The experimental results show that this system has an accuracy of 84.03% and a recall percentage of 87.28%.