On the formal semantics of IF-like logics

  • Authors:
  • Santiago Figueira;Daniel Gorín;Rafael Grimson

  • Affiliations:
  • Departamento de Computación, FCEyN, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina and CONICET, Argentina;Departamento de Computación, FCEyN, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina;Departamento de Matemática, FCEyN, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina and Theoretical Computer Science Group, Hasselt University and Transnational University of Limburg, Belgium

  • Venue:
  • Journal of Computer and System Sciences
  • Year:
  • 2010

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

In classical logics, the meaning of a formula is invariant with respect to the renaming of bound variables. This property, normally taken for granted, has been shown not to hold in the case of Independence Friendly (IF) logics. In this paper we argue that this is not an inherent characteristic of these logics but a defect in the way in which the compositional semantics given by Hodges for the regular fragment was generalized to arbitrary formulas. We fix this by proposing an alternative formalization, based on a variation of the classical notion of valuation. Basic metatheoretical results are proven. We present these results for Hodges'slash logic (from which these can be easily transferred to other IF-like logics) and we also consider the flattening operator, for which we give novel game-theoretical semantics.