Sampling algorithms: lower bounds and applications
STOC '01 Proceedings of the thirty-third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
Quantum lower bounds by polynomials
Journal of the ACM (JACM)
Hidden translation and orbit coset in quantum computing
Proceedings of the thirty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
Quantum Bounded Query Complexity
COCO '99 Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity
Lower bounds for local search by quantum arguments
STOC '04 Proceedings of the thirty-sixth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
Quantum lower bounds for the collision and the element distinctness problems
Journal of the ACM (JACM)
Quantum Query Complexity of Some Graph Problems
SIAM Journal on Computing
Polynomial degree vs. quantum query complexity
Journal of Computer and System Sciences - Special issue on FOCS 2003
The quantum query complexity of the abelian hidden subgroup problem
Theoretical Computer Science
On the power of quantum computation
SFCS '94 Proceedings of the 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
Lower Bounds for Randomized and Quantum Query Complexity Using Kolmogorov Arguments
SIAM Journal on Computing
A quantum lower bound for the query complexity of simon's problem
ICALP'05 Proceedings of the 32nd international conference on Automata, Languages and Programming
All quantum adversary methods are equivalent
ICALP'05 Proceedings of the 32nd international conference on Automata, Languages and Programming
Hi-index | 0.00 |
We present two general methods for proving lower bounds on the query complexity of nonadaptive quantum algorithms. Both methods are based on the adversary method of Ambainis. We show that they yield optimal lower bounds for several natural problems, and we challenge the reader to determine the nonadaptive quantum query complexity of the ''1-to-1 versus 2-to-1'' problem and of Hidden Translation. In addition to the results presented at Wollic 2008 in the conference version of this paper, we show that the lower bound given by the second method is always at least as good (and sometimes better) as the lower bound given by the first method. We also compare these two quantum lower bounds to probabilistic lower bounds.