Software architecture and agile software development: a clash of two cultures?

  • Authors:

  • Philippe Kruchten

  • Affiliations:

  • University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

  • Venue:
  • Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering - Volume 2
  • Year:
  • 2010

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Software architecture is taking a bad rap with the agilists---proponents of agile and lean software development approaches: "BUFD big up-front design", "YAGNI You Ain't Gonna Need It", "massive documentation", "smells of waterfall", it is pictured as a typical non-agile practice. However, certain classes of system, ignoring architectural issues too long "hit a wall" and collapse by lack of an architectural focus. 'Agile architecture': a paradox, an oxymoron, two totally incompatible approaches? In this tutorial, we examine the real issues at stake, beyond the rhetoric and posturing, and show that the two cultures can coexist and support each other, where appropriate. We define heuristics to scope how much architecture a project really needs, to assign actual value to an otherwise invisible architecture; and we review management and development practices that do work in the circumstances where some significant architectural effort is needed, when you are actually going to need it.