Viewing morphology as an inference process
SIGIR '93 Proceedings of the 16th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
The XTRIEVAL Framework at CLEF 2007: Domain-Specific Track
Advances in Multilingual and Multimodal Information Retrieval
The domain-specific track at CLEF 2008
CLEF'08 Proceedings of the 9th Cross-language evaluation forum conference on Evaluating systems for multilingual and multimodal information access
Data fusion for effective european monolingual information retrieval
CLEF'04 Proceedings of the 5th conference on Cross-Language Evaluation Forum: multilingual Information Access for Text, Speech and Images
The domain-specific track at CLEF 2008
CLEF'08 Proceedings of the 9th Cross-language evaluation forum conference on Evaluating systems for multilingual and multimodal information access
Putting it all together: the Xtrieval framework at Grid@CLEF 2009
CLEF'09 Proceedings of the 10th cross-language evaluation forum conference on Multilingual information access evaluation: text retrieval experiments
Combining query translation techniques to improve cross-language information retrieval
ECIR'11 Proceedings of the 33rd European conference on Advances in information retrieval
Effects of language and topic size in patent IR: an empirical study
CLEF'12 Proceedings of the Third international conference on Information Access Evaluation: multilinguality, multimodality, and visual analytics
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This article describes our participation at the Domain-Specific track. We used the Xtrieval framework for the preparation and execution of the experiments. The translation of the topics for the cross-lingual experiments was realized with a plug-in to access the Google AJAX language API. This year, we submitted 20 experiments in total. In all our experiments we applied a standard top-k pseudo-relevance feedback algorithm. We used merged monolingual runs as baseline for comparison to all our cross-lingual experiments. Translating the topics for the bilingual experiments decreased the retrieval effectiveness only between 8 and 15 percent.