Argumentative logics: reasoning with classically inconsistent information
Data & Knowledge Engineering
Forgetting in Managing Rules and Ontologies
WI '06 Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence
Focused search for arguments from propositional knowledge
Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008
Reasoning with inconsistent ontologies
IJCAI'05 Proceedings of the 19th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence
ESWC'05 Proceedings of the Second European conference on The Semantic Web: research and Applications
Argumentation-Based reasoning with inconsistent knowledge bases
AI'10 Proceedings of the 23rd Canadian conference on Advances in Artificial Intelligence
An argumentation framework for non-monotonic reasoning in description logic
RSKT'12 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Rough Sets and Knowledge Technology
Hi-index | 0.00 |
As a tractable description logic, DL-Lite provides a good compromise between expressive power and computational complexity of inference. It is therefore important to study ways of handling inconsistencies in tractable DL-Lite based ontologies, as classical description logics break down in the presence of inconsistent knowledge bases. In this paper, we present an argumentation-based approach to dealing with inconsistent DL-Lite based ontologies. Furthermore, we mainly develop a graph-based algorithm to implement paraconsistent reasoning in DL-Lite.