High-order finite-volume methods for the shallow-water equations on the sphere

  • Authors:
  • Paul A. Ullrich;Christiane Jablonowski;Bram van Leer

  • Affiliations:
  • Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences, Space Research Building, University of Michigan, 2455 Hayward St., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States;Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences, Space Research Building, University of Michigan, 2455 Hayward St., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States;Department of Aerospace Engineering, François-Xavier Bagnoud Building, University of Michigan, 1320 Beal Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States

  • Venue:
  • Journal of Computational Physics
  • Year:
  • 2010

Quantified Score

Hi-index 31.47

Visualization

Abstract

This paper presents a third-order and fourth-order finite-volume method for solving the shallow-water equations on a non-orthogonal equiangular cubed-sphere grid. Such a grid is built upon an inflated cube placed inside a sphere and provides an almost uniform grid point distribution. The numerical schemes are based on a high-order variant of the Monotone Upstream-centered Schemes for Conservation Laws (MUSCL) pioneered by van Leer. In each cell the reconstructed left and right states are either obtained via a dimension-split piecewise-parabolic method or a piecewise-cubic reconstruction. The reconstructed states then serve as input to an approximate Riemann solver that determines the numerical fluxes at two Gaussian quadrature points along the cell boundary. The use of multiple quadrature points renders the resulting flux high-order. Three types of approximate Riemann solvers are compared, including the widely used solver of Rusanov, the solver of Roe and the new AUSM^+-up solver of Liou that has been designed for low-Mach number flows. Spatial discretizations are paired with either a third-order or fourth-order total-variation-diminishing Runge-Kutta timestepping scheme to match the order of the spatial discretization. The numerical schemes are evaluated with several standard shallow-water test cases that emphasize accuracy and conservation properties. These tests show that the AUSM^+-up flux provides the best overall accuracy, followed closely by the Roe solver. The Rusanov flux, with its simplicity, provides significantly larger errors by comparison. A brief discussion on extending the method to arbitrary order-of-accuracy is included.