An assessment procedure for simulation models: a case study
Operations Research
Comparison of models: ex post facto validation/acceptance?
WSC '92 Proceedings of the 24th conference on Winter simulation
Independent verification and validation: a missing link in simulation methodology?
WSC '96 Proceedings of the 28th conference on Winter simulation
A case study of verification, validation, and accreditation for advanced distributed simulation
ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation (TOMACS)
Simulation verification, validation and confidence: a tutorial
Transactions of the Society for Computer Simulation International
A methodology for certification of modeling and simulation applications
ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation (TOMACS)
Simulation: The Practice of Model Development and Use
Simulation: The Practice of Model Development and Use
Proceedings of the 34th conference on Winter simulation: exploring new frontiers
Proceedings of the 34th conference on Winter simulation: exploring new frontiers
Quality assessment, verification, and validation of modeling and simulation applications
WSC '04 Proceedings of the 36th conference on Winter simulation
WSC '05 Proceedings of the 37th conference on Winter simulation
Study on simulation credibility metrics
WSC '05 Proceedings of the 37th conference on Winter simulation
Verification and validation of simulation models
Proceedings of the 39th conference on Winter simulation: 40 years! The best is yet to come
Verification, validation, and accreditation (VV&A): one voice --- unified, common & cross-cutting
Proceedings of the 2007 Summer Computer Simulation Conference
Verification & validation of an agent-based forest fire simulation model
SpringSim '10 Proceedings of the 2010 Spring Simulation Multiconference
Hi-index | 0.00 |
The independent verification and validation (IV&V) of simulation models is largely restricted to applications in the military and public policy domains. There is little evidence of IV&V for industrial simulation models. This is largely because industrial simulations are normally of a much smaller scale and do not warrant a full IV&V. A procedure for IV&V of industrial simulation models is described that provides a viable alternative where the cost and time of IV&V must be contained. The procedure consists of the following activities: structured walkthrough, review of model assumptions, code examination, review of verification procedures, replications analysis, review of static analysis, review of output reporting, and investigation of results and experimentation. The IV&V of a Sellafield Limited supply chain model is described.