Similarity Search in High Dimensions via Hashing
VLDB '99 Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases
Fingerprint Indexing Based on Novel Features of Minutiae Triplets
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Handbook of Fingerprint Recognition
Handbook of Fingerprint Recognition
Fingerprint Matching Using an Orientation-Based Minutia Descriptor
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints
International Journal of Computer Vision
An efficient parts-based near-duplicate and sub-image retrieval system
Proceedings of the 12th annual ACM international conference on Multimedia
A Performance Evaluation of Local Descriptors
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Pores and Ridges: High-Resolution Fingerprint Matching Using Level 3 Features
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Pruning SIFT for scalable near-duplicate image matching
ADC '07 Proceedings of the eighteenth conference on Australasian database - Volume 63
Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF)
Computer Vision and Image Understanding
Fingerprint Retrieval for Identification
IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
Fusion of finger types for fingerprint indexing using minutiae quadruplets
Pattern Recognition Letters
Hi-index | 0.02 |
For current fingerprint indexing schemes, global textures and minutiae structures are usually utilized. To extend the existing methods of feature extraction, we study the three most popular local descriptors, SIFT, SURF and DAISY, for fingerprint indexing and give a comparison of indexing performance for evaluation of these three features on public fingerprint databases. For index construction, the locality-sensitive hashing (LSH) is used to efficiently retrieve similarity queries in a small fraction of the database. Experiments show that SURF and DAISY are applicable for fingerprint indexing as SURF features perform equally well or better than SIFT features while DAISY improves not so significantly.