Multichannel deconvolution of seismic signals using statistical MCMC methods

Authors:
Idan Ram;Israel Cohen;Shalom Raz
Affiliations:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Technion City, Haifa, Israel;Department of Electrical Engineering, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Technion City, Haifa, Israel;Department of Electrical Engineering, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Technion City, Haifa, Israel
Venue:
IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
Year:
2010

Citing 7
Cited 0

An iterative Gibbsian technique for reconstruction of m-ary images

Pattern Recognition
Using Dynamic Programming for Solving Variational Problems in Vision

IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
A stochastic algorithm for parametric and non-parametric estimation in the case of incomplete data

Signal Processing
Regularised shortest-path extraction

Pattern Recognition Letters
Multichannel blind seismic deconvolution using dynamic programming

Signal Processing
Deconvolution of sparse spike trains by iterated windowmaximization

IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
Evaluation and applications of the iterated window maximizationmethod for sparse deconvolution

IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing

Quantified Score

Hi-index	35.68

Visualization

Abstract

In this paper, we propose two multichannel blind deconvolution algorithms for the restoration of two-dimensional (2D) seismic data. Both algorithms are based on a 2D reflectivity prior model, and use iterative multichannel deconvolution procedures which deconvolve the seismic data, while taking into account the spatial dependency between neighboring traces. The first algorithm employs in each step a modified maximum posterior mode (MPM) algorithm which estimates a reflectivity column from the corresponding observed trace using the estimate of the preceding reflectivity column. The second algorithm takes into account estimates of both the preceding and subsequent columns in the estimation process. Both algorithms are applied to synthetic and real data and demonstrate better results compared to those obtained by a single-channel deconvolution method. Expectedly, the second algorithm which utilizes more information in the estimation process of each reflectivity column is shown to produce better results than the first algorithm.