SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis
The singular value decomposition for polynomial systems
ISSAC '95 Proceedings of the 1995 international symposium on Symbolic and algebraic computation
Total Least Norm Formulation and Solution for Structured Problems
SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications
Approximate polynomial greatest common divisors and nearest singular polynomials
ISSAC '96 Proceedings of the 1996 international symposium on Symbolic and algebraic computation
Structured Total Least Norm for Nonlinear Problems
SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications
Computation of approximate polynomial GCDs and an extension
Information and Computation
Algebraic Geometry and Computer Vision: Polynomial Systems, Real andComplex Roots
Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision
Ray tracing parametric patches
SIGGRAPH '82 Proceedings of the 9th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques
A composite algorithm for finding zeros of real polynomials
A composite algorithm for finding zeros of real polynomials
Structured matrix-based methods for polynomial ∈-gcd: analysis and comparisons
Proceedings of the 2007 international symposium on Symbolic and algebraic computation
Structured total least norm and approximate GCDs of inexact polynomials
Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics
IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
QR factoring to compute the GCD of univariate approximate polynomials
IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
The calculation of the degree of an approximate greatest common divisor of two polynomials
Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics
The computation of multiple roots of a polynomial
Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics
Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics
Hi-index | 7.29 |
A non-linear structure preserving matrix method for the computation of a structured low rank approximation S(f@?,g@?) of the Sylvester resultant matrix S(f,g) of two inexact polynomials f=f(y) and g=g(y) is considered in this paper. It is shown that considerably improved results are obtained when f(y) and g(y) are processed prior to the computation of S(f@?,g@?), and that these preprocessing operations introduce two parameters. These parameters can either be held constant during the computation of S(f@?,g@?), which leads to a linear structure preserving matrix method, or they can be incremented during the computation of S(f@?,g@?), which leads to a non-linear structure preserving matrix method. It is shown that the non-linear method yields a better structured low rank approximation of S(f,g) and that the assignment of f(y) and g(y) is important because S(f@?,g@?) may be a good structured low rank approximation of S(f,g), but S(g@?,f@?) may be a poor structured low rank approximation of S(g,f) because its numerical rank is not defined. Examples that illustrate the differences between the linear and non-linear structure preserving matrix methods, and the importance of the assignment of f(y) and g(y), are shown.