An end-to-end approach to host mobility
MobiCom '00 Proceedings of the 6th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking
Proceedings of the 8th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking
TCP-R: TCP mobility support for continuous operation
ICNP '97 Proceedings of the 1997 International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP '97)
OpenDHT: a public DHT service and its uses
Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications
Resilient connections for SSH and TLS
ATEC '06 Proceedings of the annual conference on USENIX '06 Annual Technical Conference
TIPS: wrapping the sockets API for seamless IP mobility
Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on Applied computing
Implementation and performance study of IEEE 802.21 in integrated IEEE 802.11/802.16e networks
Computer Communications
At what layer does mobility belong?
IEEE Communications Magazine
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Several solutions have been proposed for Mobility Management in the Internet, ranging from the Network to the Application Layer. Existing support for mobility management is designed to work either at the lower protocol layers (L2 and L3), at the upper layers (L4, L5), or even across layers. In this paper we consider handling the mobility from the perspectives of the upper protocol layers and evaluate an implementation of this solution in comparison with relevant solutions implemented at the lower layers. This paper shares our experience in prototyping applications which tolerate connection disruptions caused by user's mobility. We also discuss, in terms of implementation, how the well-known mobility techniques should interact to handle the effects of handovers at the application level. Results obtained from experiments in a testbed are presented and compared with the performance of the Mobile IP.