Overview and comparison of localic and fixed-basis topological products

  • Authors:
  • Fatma Bayoumi;Stephen E. Rodabaugh

  • Affiliations:
  • Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science Benha University, Benha 13518, Egypt;Institute for Applied Topology and Topological Structures, College of Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics (STEM), Youngstown State University, Youngstown, OH 44555-3347, USA

  • Venue:
  • Fuzzy Sets and Systems
  • Year:
  • 2010

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.20

Visualization

Abstract

This paper studies localic products, traditional topological products, and L-topological products, and gives a complete outline of the localic product. Comparisons of localic and L-topological products are generally absent in the literature, and this paper answers longstanding open questions in that area as well as provides a complete proof of the classical comparison theorem for localic and traditional topological products. This paper contributes several L-valued comparison theorems, one of which states: the localic and L-topological products of L-topologies are order isomorphic if and only if the localic product is L-spatial, providing L is itself spatial and the family of L-topological spaces is ''prime separated''. These last two conditions always hold in the traditional setting, capturing the traditional comparison theorem as a special case, and the prime separation condition is satisfied by important lattice-valued examples that include the fuzzy real line and the fuzzy unit interval for L any complete Boolean algebra and the alternative fuzzy real line and fuzzy unit interval for L any (semi)frame. Separation conditions help control the ''sloppy'' behavior of the L-topological product when |L|2, and several separation conditions are studied in this context; and it should be noted that localic products have a point-free version of the ''product'' separation condition considered in this paper. The traditional comparison theorem is carefully proved both to fill gaps in the extant literature and to motivate the L-valued comparison theorem quoted above and reveal the special role played by cross sums of prime (L-)open subsets. En route, characterizations are given of prime L-open subsets of certain L-products, which in turn yield characterizations of prime open and irreducible closed subsets of traditional product spaces.