Behavioral profiles—a way to model and validate program behavior

  • Authors:

  • Johannes Koskinen;Markus Kettunen;Tarja Systä

  • Affiliations:

  • Department of Software Systems, Tampere University of Technology, P.O. Box 553, FIN-33101 Tampere, Finland;Department of Software Systems, Tampere University of Technology, P.O. Box 553, FIN-33101 Tampere, Finland;Department of Software Systems, Tampere University of Technology, P.O. Box 553, FIN-33101 Tampere, Finland

  • Venue:
  • Software—Practice & Experience
  • Year:
  • 2010

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Software architecture contains, in addition to its structural part, interaction patterns that can be regarded as part of the architectural solution of the system. The interaction patterns define architecturally significant behavior of the software system. In this paper we propose a visual modeling language, behavioral profiles, for specifying architecturally significant behavioral rules for an application. The language is built on the Unified Modeling Language (UML), which is a visual language widely used in software development. We show how behavioral profiles can be used to support software designers in creating behavioral models that conform to some predefined rules and for ensuring that an application behaves correctly with respect to the rules given in the profiles. A tool called Bebop was built to support software engineers in behavioral profile-based design and analysis of program behavior. To evaluate the approach and the tools in different application domains, they are utilized in three cases. The size of the applications used in the cases varies from small to quite large software systems, and from academic to industrial ones. The examples demonstrate how the approach presented can be used in practice for different steps in a software engineering process. The examples cover specializing an application framework and monitoring the program execution in run-time. In addition, they show how behavioral profiles can be used to support guided program comprehension and to validate program execution by analyzing execution traces. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.