Portfolio theory for the recourse certainty equivalent maximizing investor
Annals of Operations Research
Mathematics of Operations Research
Optimization by Vector Space Methods
Optimization by Vector Space Methods
Robust Solutions to Uncertain Semidefinite Programs
SIAM Journal on Optimization
Robust portfolio selection problems
Mathematics of Operations Research
Operations Research
Convex risk measures for portfolio optimization and concepts of flexibility
Mathematical Programming: Series A and B
Ambiguous chance constrained problems and robust optimization
Mathematical Programming: Series A and B
Extending Scope of Robust Optimization: Comprehensive Robust Counterparts of Uncertain Problems
Mathematical Programming: Series A and B
Optimization of Convex Risk Functions
Mathematics of Operations Research
Convex Approximations of Chance Constrained Programs
SIAM Journal on Optimization
A Robust Optimization Perspective on Stochastic Programming
Operations Research
Constructing Risk Measures from Uncertainty Sets
Operations Research
Constructing Uncertainty Sets for Robust Linear Optimization
Operations Research
Preface to the Special Issue on Computational Economics
Operations Research
Theory and Applications of Robust Optimization
SIAM Review
Optimization Under Probabilistic Envelope Constraints
Operations Research
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In this paper, we propose a framework for robust optimization that relaxes the standard notion of robustness by allowing the decision maker to vary the protection level in a smooth way across the uncertainty set. We apply our approach to the problem of maximizing the expected value of a payoff function when the underlying distribution is ambiguous and therefore robustness is relevant. Our primary objective is to develop this framework and relate it to the standard notion of robustness, which deals with only a single guarantee across one uncertainty set. First, we show that our approach connects closely to the theory of convex risk measures. We show that the complexity of this approach is equivalent to that of solving a small number of standard robust problems. We then investigate the conservatism benefits and downside probability guarantees implied by this approach and compare to the standard robust approach. Finally, we illustrate the methodology on an asset allocation example consisting of historical market data over a 25-year investment horizon and find in every case we explore that relaxing standard robustness with soft robustness yields a seemingly favorable risk-return trade-off: each case results in a higher out-of-sample expected return for a relatively minor degradation of out-of-sample downside performance.