RoboWarfare: can robots be more ethical than humans on the battlefield?

  • Authors:
  • John P. Sullins

  • Affiliations:
  • Philosophy Department, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, USA 94928-3609

  • Venue:
  • Ethics and Information Technology
  • Year:
  • 2010

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Telerobotically operated and semiautonomous machines have become a major component in the arsenals of industrial nations around the world. By the year 2015 the United States military plans to have one-third of their combat aircraft and ground vehicles robotically controlled. Although there are many reasons for the use of robots on the battlefield, perhaps one of the most interesting assertions are that these machines, if properly designed and used, will result in a more just and ethical implementation of warfare. This paper will focus on these claims by looking at what has been discovered about the capability of humans to behave ethically on the battlefield, and then comparing those findings with the claims made by robotics researchers that their machines are able to behave more ethically on the battlefield than human soldiers. Throughout the paper we will explore the philosophical critique of this claim and also look at how the robots of today are impacting our ability to fight wars in a just manner.