Introduction to Information Retrieval
Introduction to Information Retrieval
Developing a robust part-of-speech tagger for biomedical text
PCI'05 Proceedings of the 10th Panhellenic conference on Advances in Informatics
Extracting Protein Interactions from Text with the Unified AkaneRE Event Extraction System
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (TCBB)
Efficient Extraction of Protein-Protein Interactions from Full-Text Articles
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (TCBB)
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (TCBB)
Relation mining experiments in the pharmacogenomics domain
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Improving Protein-Protein Interaction Pair Ranking with an Integrated Global Association Score
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (TCBB)
Learning bayesian network using parse trees for extraction of protein-protein interaction
CICLing'13 Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing - Volume 2
Hi-index | 0.00 |
We present the results of the BioCreative II.5 evaluation in association with the FEBS Letters experiment, where authors created Structured Digital Abstracts to capture information about protein-protein interactions. The BioCreative II.5 challenge evaluated automatic annotations from 15 text mining teams based on a gold standard created by reconciling annotations from curators, authors, and automated systems. The tasks were to rank articles for curation based on curatable protein-protein interactions; to identify the interacting proteins (using UniProt identifiers) in the positive articles (61); and to identify interacting protein pairs. There were 595 full-text articles in the evaluation test set, including those both with and without curatable protein interactions. The principal evaluation metrics were the interpolated area under the precision/recall curve (AUC iP/R), and (balanced) F-measure. For article classification, the best AUC iP/R was 0.70; for interacting proteins, the best system achieved good macroaveraged recall (0.73) and interpolated area under the precision/recall curve (0.58), after filtering incorrect species and mapping homonymous orthologs; for interacting protein pairs, the top (filtered, mapped) recall was 0.42 and AUC iP/R was 0.29. Ensemble systems improved performance for the interacting protein task.