Towards query interoperability: PASSing PLUS

Authors:
Uri J. Braun;Margo I. Seltzer;Adriane Chapman;Barbara Blaustein;M. David Allen;Len Seligman
Affiliations:
Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences;Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences;The MITRE Corporation;The MITRE Corporation;The MITRE Corporation;The MITRE Corporation
Venue:
TAPP'10 Proceedings of the 2nd conference on Theory and practice of provenance
Year:
2010

Citing 7
Cited 1

Mapping data in peer-to-peer systems: semantics and algorithmic issues

Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data
Provenance-aware storage systems

ATEC '06 Proceedings of the annual conference on USENIX '06 Annual Technical Conference
Addressing the provenance challenge using ZOOM

Concurrency and Computation: Practice & Experience - The First Provenance Challenge
Special Issue: The First Provenance Challenge

Concurrency and Computation: Practice & Experience - The First Provenance Challenge
Tackling the Provenance Challenge one layer at a time

Concurrency and Computation: Practice & Experience - The First Provenance Challenge
PLUS: Synthesizing privacy, lineage, uncertainty and security

ICDEW '08 Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE 24th International Conference on Data Engineering Workshop
Project histories: managing data provenance across collection-oriented scientific workflow runs

DILS'07 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Data integration in the life sciences

Cross-platform provenance

Proceedings of the Joint EDBT/ICDT 2013 Workshops

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

We describe our experiences importing PASS [16] provenance into PLUS [7]. Although both systems import and export provenance that conforms to the Open Provenance Model (OPM) [14], the two systems vary greatly with respect to the granularity of provenance captured, how much semantic knowledge the system contributes, and the completeness of provenance capture. We encountered several problems reconciling provenance between the two systems and use that experience to specify a Common Provenance Framework, that provides a higher degree of interoperability between provenance systems. In each case, the problems stem from the fact that OPM interoperability is a weaker requirement than query interoperability. Our goal in presenting this work is to generate discussion about differing degrees of interoperability and the requirements thereof.