An introduction to differential evolution
New ideas in optimization
Use of a self-adaptive penalty approach for engineering optimization problems
Computers in Industry
Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms
Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms
Journal of Global Optimization
GECCO '05 Proceedings of the 7th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
A constraint handling approach for the differential evolution algorithm
CEC '02 Proceedings of the Evolutionary Computation on 2002. CEC '02. Proceedings of the 2002 Congress - Volume 02
Differential Evolution: A Handbook for Global Permutation-Based Combinatorial Optimization
Differential Evolution: A Handbook for Global Permutation-Based Combinatorial Optimization
A modified binary differential evolution algorithm
LSMS/ICSEE'10 Proceedings of the 2010 international conference on Life system modeling and simulation and intelligent computing, and 2010 international conference on Intelligent computing for sustainable energy and environment: Part II
An efficient dynamic load balancing algorithm
Computational Mechanics
Hi-index | 0.00 |
An important number of publications deal with the computational efficiency of a novel Evolutionary Algorithm called Differential Evolution (DE). However, there is still a noticeable lack of studies on DE's performance on engineering problems, which combine large-size instances, constraint-handling and mixed-integer variables issues. This paper proposes the solution by DE of process engineering problems and compares its computational performance with an exact optimization method (Branch-and-Bound) and with a Genetic Algorithm. Two analytical formulations are used to model the batch plant design problem and a set of examples gathering the three above-mentioned issues are also provided. The computational results obtained highlight the clear superiority of DE since its best found solutions always lie very close to the Branch-and-Bound optima. Moreover, for an equal number of objective function evaluations, the results repeatability was found to be much better for the DE method than for the Genetic Algorithm.