Assessing the Theoretical Strength within the Literature Review Process: A Tool for Doctoral Researchers

Authors:
David Sammon;Tadhg Nagle;Paidi O'Raghallaigh
Affiliations:
Business Information Systems, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland;Business Information Systems, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland;Business Information Systems, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
Venue:
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Bridging the Socio-technical Gap in Decision Support Systems: Challenges for the Next Decade
Year:
2010

Citing 12
Cited 0

Different perspectives on information systems: problems and solutions

ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)
Rigor and relevance: careers on the line

MIS Quarterly - Special issue on intensive research in information systems
Viewpoint: choosing appropriate information systems research methodologies

Communications of the ACM
A methodology for construct development in MIS research

European Journal of Information Systems - Special section: PACIS 2004
Understanding frameworks and reviews: a commentary to assist us in moving our field forward by analyzing our past

ACM SIGMIS Database
Eight key issues for the decision support systems discipline

Decision Support Systems
Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review

MIS Quarterly
The identity crisis within the is discipline: defining and communicating the discipline's core properties

MIS Quarterly
Reach and grasp

MIS Quarterly
The information systems identity crisis: focusing on high-visibility and high-impact research

MIS Quarterly
The nature of theory in information systems

MIS Quarterly
Toward improving the relevance of information systems research to practice: the role of applicability checks

MIS Quarterly

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Making a theoretical contribution can be viewed as one of the most important and confusing objectives for a doctoral researcher. Focusing on the literature review process, this paper highlights the need to develop a tool that will enable doctoral researchers to assess the theoretical strength of the literature they survey. Through synthesizing theory development literature, from both a general research and IS perspective, we propose a tool to aid 'new' doctoral researchers in understanding the theoretical landscape within a domain. We then discuss how the tool can be utilized in the wider doctoral research process to combat the issues of rigor and relevance that have permeated the fabric of Information Systems (IS) research, through aiding in a two step literature review process of [1] categorizing the literature and [2] developing a theoretical framework to guide making a theoretical contribution.