Burden of proof in legal argumentation
ICAIL '95 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Argumentation and standards of proof
Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof
Artificial Intelligence
Modular argumentation for modelling legal doctrines of performance relief
Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Argumentation Context Systems: A Framework for Abstract Group Argumentation
LPNMR '09 Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010
Probabilistic Semantics for the Carneades Argument Model Using Bayesian Networks
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010
Nonmonotonic tools for argumentation
JELIA'10 Proceedings of the 12th European conference on Logics in artificial intelligence
On the relationship between Carneades and Defeasible Logic
Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Analyzing open source license compatibility issues with Carneades
Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Towards argument representational tools for hybrid argumentation systems
HCII'11 Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Human interface and the management of information: interacting with information - Volume Part II
Relating the semantics of abstract dialectical frameworks and standard AFs
IJCAI'11 Proceedings of the Twenty-Second international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume Volume Two
Relating Carneades with abstract argumentation
IJCAI'11 Proceedings of the Twenty-Second international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume Volume Two
The modular logic of private international law
Artificial Intelligence and Law - Special issue on Deontic Logic and Normative Systems
Abstract dialectical frameworks revisited
IJCAI'13 Proceedings of the Twenty-Third international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence
Approximating operators and semantics for abstract dialectical frameworks
Artificial Intelligence
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Carneades is a rather general framework for argumentation. Unlike many other approaches, Carneades captures a number of aspects, like proof burdens, proof standards etc., which are of central importance, in particular in legal argumentation. In this paper we show how Carneades argument evaluation structures can be reconstructed as abstract dialectical frameworks (ADFs), a recently proposed generalization of Dung argumentation frameworks (AFs). This not only provides at least an indirect link between Carneades and AFs, it also allows us to handle arbitrary argument cycles, thus lifting a restriction of Carneades. At the same time it provides strong evidence for the usefulness of ADFs as analytical/semantical tools in argumentation.