Pipelining Argumentation Technologies

Authors:
Mark Snaith;Joseph Devereux;John Lawrence;Chris Reed
Affiliations:
School of Computing, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 4HN, UK;School of Computing, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 4HN, UK;School of Computing, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 4HN, UK;School of Computing, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 4HN, UK
Venue:
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010
Year:
2010

Citing 10
Cited 2

On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games

Artificial Intelligence
Principled design of the modern Web architecture

ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT)
Towards an argument interchange format

The Knowledge Engineering Review
AVERs: an argument visualization tool for representing stories about evidence

Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Computing ideal sceptical argumentation

Artificial Intelligence
Laying the foundations for a World Wide Argument Web

Artificial Intelligence
An algorithm to compute minimally grounded and admissible defence sets in argument systems

Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006
Semi-Stable Semantics

Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006
Cohere: Towards Web 2.0 Argumentation

Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008
Dungine: a Java Dung Reasoner

Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008

Araucaria-PL: software for teaching argumentation theory

TICTTL'11 Proceedings of the Third international congress conference on Tools for teaching logic
A review of argumentation for the Social Semantic Web

Semantic Web

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Software tools for working with argument generally exist as large systems that wrap their entire feature set in the application as a whole. This approach, while perfectly valid, can result in users having to use small parts of multiple systems to carry out a specific task. In this paper, we present a series of web services, that each encapsulate small pieces of functionality for working with argument. We then demonstrate two example systems built by connecting these services in the form of a UNIX-style pipeline.