Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms
Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms
Metaheuristics in combinatorial optimization: Overview and conceptual comparison
ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)
Distributed computing in practice: the Condor experience: Research Articles
Concurrency and Computation: Practice & Experience - Grid Performance
Approximating the Nondominated Front Using the Pareto Archived Evolution Strategy
Evolutionary Computation
Comparison of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: Empirical Results
Evolutionary Computation
Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems (Genetic and Evolutionary Computation)
Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems (Genetic and Evolutionary Computation)
Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures
Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures
Multiobjective optimization problems with complicated Pareto sets, MOEA/D and NSGA-II
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
Performance scaling of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms
EMO'03 Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Evolutionary multi-criterion optimization
Design issues in a multiobjective cellular genetic algorithm
EMO'07 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Evolutionary multi-criterion optimization
EMO'07 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Evolutionary multi-criterion optimization
PPSN'06 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature
A scalable multi-objective test problem toolkit
EMO'05 Proceedings of the Third international conference on Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization
Improving PSO-Based multi-objective optimization using crowding, mutation and ∈-dominance
EMO'05 Proceedings of the Third international conference on Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization
Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case studyand the strength Pareto approach
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
The particle swarm - explosion, stability, and convergence in amultidimensional complex space
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
Intelligent evolutionary algorithms for large parameter optimization problems
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
A review of multiobjective test problems and a scalable test problem toolkit
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
An Investigation on Preference Order Ranking Scheme for Multiobjective Evolutionary Optimization
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
MOEA/D: A Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
On the Evolutionary Optimization of Many Conflicting Objectives
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
AbYSS: Adapting Scatter Search to Multiobjective Optimization
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
jMetal: A Java framework for multi-objective optimization
Advances in Engineering Software
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
Approaches to parallelize pareto ranking in NSGA-II algorithm
PPAM'11 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Parallel Processing and Applied Mathematics - Volume Part II
A local multiobjective optimization algorithm using neighborhood field
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
Hi-index | 0.00 |
To evaluate the search capabilities of a multiobjective algorithm, the usual approach is to choose a benchmark of known problems, to perform a fixed number of function evaluations, and to apply a set of quality indicators. However, while real problems could have hundreds or even thousands of decision variables, current benchmarks are normally adopted with relatively few decision variables (normally from 10 to 30). Furthermore, performing a constant number of evaluations does not provide information about the effort required by an algorithm to get a satisfactory set of solutions; this information would also be of interest in real scenarios, where evaluating the functions defining the problem can be computationally expensive. In this paper, we study the effect of parameter scalability in a number of state-of-the-art multiobjective metaheuristics. We adopt a benchmark of parameter-wise scalable problems (the Zitzler-Deb-Thiele test suite) and analyze the behavior of eight multiobjective metaheuristics on these test problems when using a number of decision variables that range from 8 up to 2048. By using the hypervolume indicator as a stopping condition, we also analyze the computational effort required by each algorithm in order to reach the Pareto front. We conclude that the two analyzed algorithms based on particle swarm optimization and differential evolution yield the best overall results.