Information filtering and information retrieval: two sides of the same coin?
Communications of the ACM - Special issue on information filtering
Variations in relevance judgments and the evaluation of retrieval performance
Information Processing and Management: an International Journal
Variations in relevance assessments and the measurement of retrieval effectiveness
Journal of the American Society for Information Science - Special issue: evaluation of information retrieval systems
Variations in relevance judgments and the measurement of retrieval effectiveness
Proceedings of the 21st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
Reusable learning objects: a survey of LOM-based repositories
Proceedings of the tenth ACM international conference on Multimedia
CLEF '01 Revised Papers from the Second Workshop of the Cross-Language Evaluation Forum on Evaluation of Cross-Language Information Retrieval Systems
IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Systems that filter web search results to return open educational resources need evaluation. The Cranfield method, which is widely used in information retrieval evaluation, can be used as the basis of a model for evaluating such systems. The Cranfield method requires a collection of resources with associated judgments. In this paper, we describe an experiment to collect judgments of whether open resources are educational material. We show experimentally that judges can agree on what resources are educational material, even in the absence of an educational context, and demonstrate that displaying the query used to retrieve the resource makes a judge less likely to rate a resource as educational.