A study of the LCMV and MVDR noise reduction filters

  • Authors:
  • Mehrez Souden;Jacob Benesty;Sofiène Affes

  • Affiliations:
  • Université du Québec, INRS-EMT, Montréal, QC, Canada;Université du Québec, INRS-EMT, Montréal, QC, Canada;Université du Québec, INRS-EMT, Montréal, QC, Canada

  • Venue:
  • IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
  • Year:
  • 2010

Quantified Score

Hi-index 35.69

Visualization

Abstract

In real-world environments, the signals captured by a set of microphones in a speech communication system are mixtures of the desired signal, interference, and ambient noise. A promising solution for proper speech acqnisition (with reduced noise and interference) in this context consists in using the linearly constrained minimum variance (LCMV) beamformer to reject the interference, reduce the overall mixture energy, and preserve the target signal. The minimum variance distortionless response beamformer (MVDR) is also commonly known to reduce the interference plus-noise energy without distorting the desired signal. In either case, it is of paramount importance to accurately quantify the achieved noise and interference reduction. Indeed, it is quite reasonable to ask, for instance, about the price that has to be paid in order to achieve total removal of the interference without distorting the target signal when nsing the LCMV. Besides, it is fundamental to understand the effect of the MVDR on both noise and interference. In this correspondence, we investigate the performance of the MVDR and LCMV beamformers when the interference and ambient noise coexist with the target source. We demonstrate a new relationship between both filters in which the MVDR is decomposed into the LCMV and a matched filter (MVDR solution in the absence of interference). Both components are properly weighted to achieve maximum interference-plusnoise reduction. We investigate the performance of the MVDR, LCMV, and matched filters and elaborate new closed-form expressions for their output signal-to-interference ratio (SIR) and output signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). We theoretically demonstrate the tradeoff that has to be made between noise reduction and interference rejection. In fact, the total removal of the interference may severely amplify the residual ambient noise. Conversely, totally focussing on noise reduction leads to increased level of residual interference. The proposed study is finally supported by several numerical examples.