Apples and oranges: comparing schedule- and contention-based medium access control

  • Authors:
  • Jonathan Lutz;Charles J. Colbourn;Violet R. Syrotiuk

  • Affiliations:
  • Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA;Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA;Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA

  • Venue:
  • Proceedings of the 13th ACM international conference on Modeling, analysis, and simulation of wireless and mobile systems
  • Year:
  • 2010

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Comparison of schedule and contention based MAC protocols is made difficult by their fundamental differences in approach to medium access control. This paper provides a way in which to analyze and compare MAC protocols regardless of their underlying allocation strategy. To that end a framework is developed in which the persistence of any protocol, contention- or schedule-based, can be measured. The framework is used to measure and compare the persistence levels of two prototypical contention- and schedule-based MACs, IEEE 802.11 and Scheduled p-Persistence. An ideal persistence that provides lexicographically max-min fair access to the channel is characterized, and used as a bandwidth allocation scheme. In addition to reducing the unfairness, simulations employing the ideal persistence values show increased throughput and decreased delay and drop rate when compared to either Scheduled p-Persistence or IEEE 802.11.