Summarizing contrastive viewpoints in opinionated text

  • Authors:
  • Michael J. Paul;ChengXiang Zhai;Roxana Girju

  • Affiliations:
  • University of Illinois, Urbana, IL;University of Illinois, Urbana, IL;University of Illinois, Urbana, IL

  • Venue:
  • EMNLP '10 Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
  • Year:
  • 2010

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This paper presents a two-stage approach to summarizing multiple contrastive viewpoints in opinionated text. In the first stage, we use an unsupervised probabilistic approach to model and extract multiple viewpoints in text. We experiment with a variety of lexical and syntactic features, yielding significant performance gains over bag-of-words feature sets. In the second stage, we introduce Comparative LexRank, a novel random walk formulation to score sentences and pairs of sentences from opposite viewpoints based on both their representativeness of the collection as well as their contrastiveness with each other. Experimental results show that the proposed approach can generate informative summaries of viewpoints in opinionated text.