Approximability and hardness in multi-objective optimization

  • Authors:
  • Christian Glaßer;Christian Reitwießner;Heinz Schmitz;Maximilian Witek

  • Affiliations:
  • Lehrstuhl für Theoretische Informatik, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany;Lehrstuhl für Theoretische Informatik, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany;Fachbereich Informatik, Fachhochschule Trier, Trier, Germany;Lehrstuhl für Theoretische Informatik, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany

  • Venue:
  • CiE'10 Proceedings of the Programs, proofs, process and 6th international conference on Computability in Europe
  • Year:
  • 2010

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

We study the approximability and the hardness of combinatorial multi-objective NP optimization problems (multi-objective problems, for short). Our contributions are: - We define and compare several solution notions that capture reasonable algorithmic tasks for computing optimal solutions. - These solution notions induce corresponding NP-hardness notions for which we prove implication and separation results. - We define approximative solution notions and investigate in which cases polynomial-time solvability translates from one to another notion. Moreover, for problems where all objectives have to be minimized, approximability results translate from single-objective to multi-objective optimization such that the relative error degrades only by a constant factor. Such translations are not possible for problems where all objectives have to be maximized (unless P = NP). As a consequence we see that in contrast to single-objective problems (where the solution notions coincide), the situation is more subtle for multiple objectives. So it is important to exactly specify the NP-hardness notion when discussing the complexity of multi-objective problems.