On the benefits and feasibility of incentive based routing infrastructure
Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Practice and theory of incentives in networked systems
Towards an evolvable internet architecture
Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications
Network monitors and contracting systems: competition and innovation
Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications
How to lease the internet in your spare time
ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
Modeling the adoption of new network architectures
CoNEXT '07 Proceedings of the 2007 ACM CoNEXT conference
Dynamics of competition between incumbent and emerging network technologies
Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Economics of networked systems
Cabernet: connectivity architecture for better network services
CoNEXT '08 Proceedings of the 2008 ACM CoNEXT Conference
Optimal pricing and capacity partitioning for tiered access service in virtual networks
Computer Networks: The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking
Hi-index | 0.00 |
The difficulty of making changes to the internet architecture has spawned widespread interest in virtualized testbeds as a place to deploy new services. Despite the excitement, uncertainty surrounds the question of how technologies can bridge the gap from testbed to global availability. It is recognized that no amount of validation will spur today's ISPs to make architectural changes, so the testbed itself must somehow provide global availability. We investigate whether a virtualized architecture that is widely offered by commercial ISPs would support the adoption of new services or upgrades to the infrastructure, and whether ISPs would ever support such an architecture. According to our economic analysis, the answer depends critically on how money flows to network and service providers. If the virtualized network inherits the market structure prevalent on the internet today, which we call network-gatekeeper, investment levels are likely to be poor. On the other hand, we identify two superior market types, mix-and-match and service-gatekeeper, which can improve incentives to invest in services, and even in network upgrades. We discuss how these market types may be implemented.