Comparison between two approximation methods of state space fractional systems

Authors:
Mansouri Rachid;Bettayeb Maamar;Djennoune Said
Affiliations:
Laboratoire de Conception et Conduite des Systèmes de Production, University Mouloud Mammeri of Tizi-Ouzou, Algeria;Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates;Laboratoire de Conception et Conduite des Systèmes de Production, University Mouloud Mammeri of Tizi-Ouzou, Algeria
Venue:
Signal Processing
Year:
2011

Citing 4
Cited 3

A method for modelling and simulation of fractional systems

Signal Processing - Special issue: Fractional signal processing and applications
Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations, Volume 204 (North-Holland Mathematics Studies)

Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations, Volume 204 (North-Holland Mathematics Studies)
Fractional order control: a tutorial

ACC'09 Proceedings of the 2009 conference on American Control Conference
Brief State-space representation for fractional order controllers

Automatica (Journal of IFAC)

Fractional integro-differential calculus and its control-theoretical applications. I. Mathematical fundamentals and the problem of interpretation

Automation and Remote Control
Fractional models for modeling complex linear systems under poor frequency resolution measurements

Digital Signal Processing
Fractional integro-differential calculus and its control-theoretical applications. II. Fractional dynamic systems: Modeling and hardware implementation

Automation and Remote Control

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.08

Visualization

Abstract

A large number of real dynamic systems are better characterized using a non-integer order dynamic model based on fractional order differential equations. Nevertheless, their analytical solutions are rather complicated. In this paper we present two alternative methods of simulation of the fractional order dynamical system in state space. We particularly present a comparison between two approximation methods. The first one is based on the differentiation operator approximation and thus uses the usual form of the state space representation D^(^@a^)(x)=Ax+Bu. The second method is based on the approximation of the integration operator and uses, in this case, the new representation w=AI^(^@a^)(w)+Bu. The comparison between these two methods is made on the basis of initial and steady state approximation state and output errors which are characterized in this present paper. Numerical examples are also given to support this comparison.