Translations between RDF(S) and conceptual graphs

Authors:
Jean-François Baget;Madalina Croitoru;Alain Gutierrez;Michel Leclère;Marie-Laure Mugnier
Affiliations:
LIRMM, University of Montpellier II & CNRS, INRIA Sophia-Antipolis, France;LIRMM, University of Montpellier II & CNRS, INRIA Sophia-Antipolis, France;LIRMM, University of Montpellier II & CNRS, INRIA Sophia-Antipolis, France;LIRMM, University of Montpellier II & CNRS, INRIA Sophia-Antipolis, France;LIRMM, University of Montpellier II & CNRS, INRIA Sophia-Antipolis, France
Venue:
ICCS'10 Proceedings of the 18th international conference on Conceptual structures: from information to intelligence
Year:
2010

Citing 5
Cited 1

Conceptual structures: information processing in mind and machine

Conceptual structures: information processing in mind and machine
Knowledge Representation and Reasonings Based on Graph Homomorphism

ICCS '00 Proceedings of the Linguistic on Conceptual Structures: Logical Linguistic, and Computational Issues
Graph-based Knowledge Representation: Computational Foundations of Conceptual Graphs

Graph-based Knowledge Representation: Computational Foundations of Conceptual Graphs
Extensions of simple conceptual graphs: the complexity of rules and constraints

Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
RDF entailment as a graph homomorphism

ISWC'05 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on The Semantic Web

Review: Formal Concept Analysis in knowledge processing: A survey on models and techniques

Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Though similarities between the Semantic Web language RDF(S) and languages of the Conceptual Graphs family have often been pointed out, the differences between these formalisms have been a source of difficulties while trying to translate objets of a language into the other. In this paper, we present two such transformations, that have been implemented into the CoGUI platform, and discuss their respective strengths and weaknesses.