A relevance terminological logic for information retrieval
SIGIR '96 Proceedings of the 19th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
A Sequent Calculus for Reasoning in Four-Valued Description Logics
TABLEAUX '97 Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Reasoning with Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods
Reasoning with Individuals for the Description Logic SHIQ
CADE-17 Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Automated Deduction
Knowledge Representation Techniques (Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing)
Knowledge Representation Techniques (Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing)
Paraconsistent Logic Programs with Four-Valued Rough Sets
RSCTC '08 Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing
Paraconsistent Reasoning for OWL 2
RR '09 Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Web Reasoning and Rule Systems
Modeling and Reasoning with Paraconsistent Rough Sets
Fundamenta Informaticae
Paraconsistent and approximate semantics for the OWL 2 web ontology language
RSCTC'10 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Rough sets and current trends in computing
Paraconsistent reasoning for semantic web agents
Transactions on Compuational Collective Intelligence VI
Inconsistency-tolerant reasoning with OWL DL
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Description logics [1] refer to a family of formalisms concentrated around concepts, roles and individuals. They are used in many multiagent and semantic web applications as a foundation for specifying knowledge bases and reasoning about them. One of widely applied description logics is SHIQ [7,8]. In the current paper we address the problem of inconsistent knowledge. Inconsistencies may naturally appear in the considered application domains, for example as a result of fusing knowledge from distributed sources. We define three three-valued paraconsistent semantics for SHIQ, reflecting different meanings of concept inclusion of practical importance. We also provide a quite general syntactic condition of safeness guaranteeing satisfiability of a knowledge base w.r.t. three-valued semantics and define a faithful translation of our formalism into a suitable version of a two-valued description logic. Such a translation allows one to use existing tools and SHIQ reasoners to deal with inconsistent knowledge.