Relating two image-based diagrammatic reasoning architectures

Authors:
Michael Anderson;George Furnas
Affiliations:
Department of Computer Science, University of Hartford, West Hartford, CT;School of Information and Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Venue:
Diagrams'10 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Diagrammatic representation and inference
Year:
2010

Citing 8
Cited 1

Towards diagram processing: a diagrammatic information system

AAAI '99/IAAI '99 Proceedings of the sixteenth national conference on Artificial intelligence and the eleventh Innovative applications of artificial intelligence conference innovative applications of artificial intelligence
Using pixel rewrites for shape-rich interaction

Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
The Use of Intermediat Graphical Constructions in Problem Solving with Dynamic, Pixel-Level Diagrams

Diagrams '00 Proceedings of the First International Conference on Theory and Application of Diagrams
Diagram processing: computing with diagrams

Artificial Intelligence
Extending cognitive architectures with spatial and visual imagery mechanisms

Extending cognitive architectures with spatial and visual imagery mechanisms
Inter-diagrammatic reasoning

IJCAI'95 Proceedings of the 14th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 1
Graphical Deadlock Avoidance

ACT '09 Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Control, and Telecommunication Technologies
Diagrammatic reasoning and cases

AAAI'96 Proceedings of the thirteenth national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 2

Twelve years of diagrams research

Journal of Visual Languages and Computing

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

To advance the understanding of different diagrammatic reasoning architectures that reason directly with images, we examine the relationship between Anderson's Inter-Diagrammatic Reasoning (IDR) architecture and Furnas' BITPICT architecture using the technique of cross-implementation. Implementing substantial functionality of each in the other, and noting what is easy and what is difficult, yields insights into the two architectures and such systems in general.