Analyses of multiple evidence combination
Proceedings of the 20th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
Improving the effectiveness of information retrieval with local context analysis
ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS)
A probabilistic model of information retrieval: development and comparative experiments Part 2
Information Processing and Management: an International Journal
Simple BM25 extension to multiple weighted fields
Proceedings of the thirteenth ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management
A comparison of statistical significance tests for information retrieval evaluation
Proceedings of the sixteenth ACM conference on Conference on information and knowledge management
CLEF 2009 ad hoc track overview: robust-WSD task
CLEF'09 Proceedings of the 10th cross-language evaluation forum conference on Multilingual information access evaluation: text retrieval experiments
From fusion to re-ranking: a semantic approach
Proceedings of the 33rd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
CLEF 2009 ad hoc track overview: robust-WSD task
CLEF'09 Proceedings of the 10th cross-language evaluation forum conference on Multilingual information access evaluation: text retrieval experiments
Ranking Algorithm for Semantic Document Annotations
International Journal of Information Retrieval Research
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper presents the participation of the semantic Nlevels search engine SENSE at the CLEF 2009 Ad Hoc Robust-WSD Task. Our aim is to demonstrate that the combination of the N-levels model and WSD can improve the retrieval performance even when an effective retrieval model is adopted. To reach this aim, we worked on two different strategies. On one hand a model, based on Okapi BM25, was adopted at each level. On the other hand, we integrated a local relevance feedback technique, called Local Context Analysis, in both indexing levels of the system (keyword and word meaning). The hypothesis that Local Context Analysis can be effective even when it works on word meanings coming from a WSD algorithm is supported by experimental results. In monolingual task MAP increased of about 2% exploiting disambiguation, while GMAP increased from 4% to 9% when we used WSD in both mono- and bi- lingual tasks.