Comparison of image restoration methods for lunar epithermal neutron emission mapping

  • Authors:

  • T. P. McClanahan;V. Ivatury;G. Milikh;G. Nandikotkur;R. C. Puetter;R. Z. Sagdeev;D. Usikov;I. G. Mitrofanov

  • Affiliations:

  • NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Astrochemistry Laboratory, Building 34, Room W218, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA;NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Astrochemistry Laboratory, Building 34, Room W218, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA and Aerospace Engineering Dept, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA;Space Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA;Space Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA;Pixon Imaging LLC, San Diego, CA 92117, USA;Space Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA;Space Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA;Institute for Space Research, Moscow, Russia

  • Venue:
  • Computers & Geosciences
  • Year:
  • 2010

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Orbital measurements of neutrons by the Lunar Exploring Neutron Detector (LEND) onboard the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter are being used to quantify the spatial distribution of near surface hydrogen (H). Inferred H concentration maps have low signal-to-noise (SN) and image restoration (IR) techniques are being studied to enhance results. A single-blind, two-phase study is described in which four teams of researchers independently developed image restoration techniques optimized for LEND data. Synthetic lunar epithermal neutron emission maps were derived from LEND simulations. These data were used as ground truth to determine the relative quantitative performance of the IR methods vs. a default denoising (smoothing) technique. We review and used factors influencing orbital remote sensing of neutrons emitted from the lunar surface to develop a database of synthetic ''true'' maps for performance evaluation. A prior independent training phase was implemented for each technique to assure methods were optimized before the blind trial. Method performance was determined using several regional root-mean-square error metrics specific to epithermal signals of interest. Results indicate unbiased IR methods realize only small signal gains in most of the tested metrics. This suggests other physically based modeling assumptions are required to produce appreciable signal gains in similar low SN IR applications.